2.15.2010

Survivor: Apocalypse (Conflict - Nathan Kaneshiro)


***SPOILER WARNING: DO NOT READ THE LAST PARAGRAPH IF YOU WISH TO READ THIS BOOK UNSPOILED***

Set in post-apocalyptic rural America, and surrounded by ash and empty towns, the unnamed protagonist in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, is pushed to the edge of his moral and psychological limits. Trying to survive a journey to the coast as well as fighting off lurking cannibals and harsh weather, the man in The Road pushes past the deviant packs of survivors that impose insurmountable pressure to conform to their diabolical ways. He also seems to have an edge cognitively, thinking about consequences preemptively which usually leads to avoiding danger and death. As he and his son wander about the wasteland that surrounds them, they are the sole individuals possessing any sort of conscious way of thinking.

In contrast to the rambling group of surviving nomads, the man seems to resist physiological urges in an almost superhuman manner. For instance, while everyone around him seems to eat anything and everything that moves just to satiate themselves, the man tries to serve majority of his food and drink to his son, although his son refuses to be spoiled in such a manner. He is also adamant and makes very clear to his son that they are not cannibals and will never eat another human being whether it is consciously or driven by impulse. This is accomplished however, through the man’s meticulous manner of which he forages and scavenges for food, carefully avoiding spoiled or potent sustenance.

McCarthy’s description of the man in the novel portrays a very survival-savvy and well-educated character. The man’s inventive nature also aids in his and his son’s struggle for survival, despite multiplying odds in favor of their demise. In the book, the man ventures into many abandoned houses in search for food, but he often ignores many canned foods, but he explains to his son that they were not the first inside, thus remaining food usually remains for a reason. He is also methodical in doing as much as he can to ensure the survival of his son and himself, like when he gathers seemingly empty gas cans and drips out whatever remaining fuel is in them to use for their lamp. Such a nature leads to a prolonged existence, whereas the other “survivors” seem to react purely on instinct and physiological needs, eventually leading to a contradiction in the title “survivor”.

In the end, the man does pass away, not from any immediate cause, but rather from a previous growing condition. It is then left to his son to be the conscious superhuman in the midst of all of the mindless evil that surrounds them. It is through his son that his legacy continues, his lessons of life and survival, and his character which was pure and illuminated through the constant darkness.

Completed in: ~60 min :[

6 comments:

  1. Hey Nate,

    I liked your intro paragraph...good use of vocabulary! You had a good flow throughout the essay and it made it very easy to read. Although the conflict in this novel is pretty self explanatory, you might want to highlight your key points more...other than that nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nathan,
    Great introduction and conclusion. The body paragraphs are a little repetitive, but I think this helps reinforce the contrast between the methodical man and his society.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really liked this essay. It obviously answered the question, which is a plus. You may want to cut down on some of the repetitive parts of the middle section. I know it just sort of happens, believe me, i'm plagued by it. But yeah, other than that, i thought it was good. I haven't read the book, but i liked how your essay explained it to me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Natey Pie,

    Lovely word choice. I like how you used "demise". Word stealer -__-;
    Anyway, this was good. I know Jordan and Jacob (I'm assuming...MacGeekJew ._.) said it already, and I'm just sounding like a broken record, but the middle part was a bit repetitive. Fix that up and it'll be perfect.
    I've never read the book, but it sounds interesting. Definately an id versus superego thing going on here. haha.

    good job.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with all the comments above. I liked the split of paragraphs, and the content was well thought out. Good job bro. =D

    ReplyDelete
  6. Comment from Noelle (her computer was acting up, so she asked me to post her comments through my account)
    ____________________________________________
    Great introduction; its content and the style in which it is written makes it very compelling and does a good job of drawing the reader in. I also like how you thouroughly elaborated on the unnamed protagonist's charateristics and how exactly they conflicted with his society. And great use of vocabulary. Good job =]

    ReplyDelete